Anonymous peer review


The Editorial Board has enrolled well-known and outstanding scientists from the sphere of economics, management, social sciences and tourism for the implementation of double-blind peer review of each received paper. The Editor-in-chief, after checking the originality of the text, deletes the author's name from the text of the manuscript and provides it to two reviewers not affiliated with the same institution. During the evaluation process, the reviewers fill in the special review form and in its final part they mark their categorical opinion whether the received manuscript should be rejected or accepted (without corrections, with some necessary emendation and without second review, or second review after the recommended necessary corrections are done). In case one of the two reviewers rejects the paper, it should be consigned for evaluation to an arbitrator whose positive evaluation is a necessary condition for continuation of the procedure. After the submission of the review forms the Editor-in-chief informs the author of the opinion of the reviewers and, if necessary, provides the final part of the review to the author (Recommendations and overall evaluation) in order to make the needed emendations. The author should return the edited article within two weeks.

The name and the affiliation of the author are added to the text, the pre-press and page data setting is done and the author receives the article to authorize it. This is the last chance for making (some slight) corrections.

The Editor-in-Chief is responsible for determining and conveying the final decision on all manuscripts. The Editor-in-Chief have the right to reject the materials that do not conform to the purpose of the journal and do not meet the above-mentioned criteria.